Editorial: Critical literature reviews in open source journals
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Guest Editorial: Reading literature and literature reviews
Most scholars would probably agree that literature reviews are key building blocks of good research articles in Library and Information science (LIS). Yet current practices in conducting these reviews may not necessarily be conducive to innovative research because they emphasize the science of the process rather than the art. At the beginning of the 21st century, the act of doing a literature r...
متن کاملEditorial: Stable funding for open source software?
Oliver Goldsmith said, ‘Where wealth accumulates, men decay’: this should make many programmers of free open source software some of the healthiest people on the planet. One can only aspire to be of independent means and become what the Victorians might have called ‘A gentleman bioinformatician’; after all, if you’re going to have delusions you may as well have really satisfying ones. The reali...
متن کاملEvidence-based medicine, Cochrane reviews and open-access journals.
First, the authors raised an importance of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and mentioned 2 examples: the risky sleeping position for babies and the side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs. They concluded that “doctors’ clinical judgment is not infallible and clinical practice needs to be informed by good research evidence.” In 1996, Sackett et al 2 originally defined EBM as the conscientious, explic...
متن کاملGuest Editorial Open-Source Software for Engineering Education: Pedagogical Strategies That Leverage Open-Source Tools
V AST numbers of students and other people interested in learning resources can now exploit learning infrastructures and learning designs on the Web. Even larger learning resources reside in universities' and organizations' intranets and Web-accessible e-learning systems. As the amount of learning content available on the Web continues to grow rapidly, it is increasingly important to define eff...
متن کاملMeasuring Open Source Quality: A Literature Review
There is an ample debate over the quality of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) with mixed research results. The authors show that a reason for these mixed results is that quality is being defined, measured, and evaluated differently. They report the most popular approaches including software structure measures, process measures, and maturity assessment models. The way researchers have bui...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Tappi Journal
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0734-1415']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32964/tj22.6.361